Home

You need our services when..

We deliver experience...

We deliver results...

Proven value added benefits

Services

Partner Profiles

Articles

Current Happenings

Useful Links

Contact Us











 

 

 

 

 

The Case of the Disappearing Profits

Author Paul Beretz

Daniel Dapper, a dynamic salesman with limited financial expertise, founded LIV-HI INC., a CA corp. in 1997. While his profit margins were thin, the business grew to $100,000 monthly sales by the by the latter part of 2001. In December of that year, Mr. Dapper began an expansion program designed to produce an increase of 50% in sales with all expectations of getting his business to a very profitable level.

The program he had outlined gave immediate results. Sales increased dramatically from $100,000 in December to $150,000 by January 2002. As indicated in the very simple summary income statement below (also known as "operating statement" or "profit and loss statement"), the higher revenue generated $15,000 in earnings the first month:

LIV-HI Inc., Cash Flow 1/1/01-1/31/01
Sales
$   150,000
Cost of Sales
    (105,000)
Gen. & Admin. Exp.
      (30,000)
Net Income
$     15,000

 

 

 

However, Dan Dapper (known as "Dandy" to his friends) was not in a position to enjoy his success. While the company showed profits, the big jump in sales lead to a $25,000 cash flow deficit. By the end of January 2002, the company was out of cash.

Note:
1. The cash flow deficit was not the result of any unusual event - it developed from the relationships that would impact Dan's cash flow.
2. The deficit was a surprise to the owner (and maybe creditors?). He thought that a profitable operation meant positive cash flow. What is more important - profits or cash flow?

What Mr. Dapper forgot was that the income statement is an accrual statement - it records sales when they occur, not 30 days later, when the business collects the accounts receivable. In addition, expenses are accrued as incurred, although a company may pay those obligations later. Some expenses, such as depreciation and amortization of prepaid items, represent prior cash payments and this even adds more mystery (smoke) to the picture of cash flow - to creditors and the owner.


What Dan Dapper should have recognized in his cash flow is that:
1. A/R, the only source of cash for LIV-HI Inc., may turn (or may not turn) in an average of 30 days.
2. Dan bought $105,000 in inventory in December to meet January's sales forecast and to maintain its credit rating, they had to pay in 30 days.
3. Dan pays all operating expense as incurred, with non-accrued for payment in the following month.

So with these facts in mind, Dan's projected and actual cash flow for January would be

LIV-HI Inc., Cash Flow 1/1/01-1/31/01
Beginning Cash (in bank)
$   10,000
Collections (Dec. sales)
   100,000
Operating Expenses
    (30,000)
Payments (December purchases)
  (105,000)
Cash shortage
$  (25,000)

 

 

 


Conclusion: What appears to be a $15,000 profit for the month of January is a $25,000 cash flow deficit. The $40,000 difference emphasizes the difference between accrual and cash accounting.

Solving the Mystery: Dan Dapper could have filled the funds gap with external financing, additional investment or accelerating collections of accounts receivable.

What is the Moral of the Story? Credit managers beware: look for the "hidden card," the smoke, the mirrors: watch the flow of cash!